-

In this article, by comparing the vIewpoints of rhetoric savants and their inherited definitions; specially that one of Sakaki with the standpoints and communicative models which are presented
by the founders science of commul11cation in the 20th century A.D. We will find that both of these opinions are very close 10 other and the components of communicative models like: the sender of the message, the receiver of the message, the message Itself and even the
commul11cMions media all could be found in defil1ltlons presentcd by rhetoric. Moreover, and by scrutinizing those viwepoints of the olds we arrive at such a concllision that what has l1een presented in the sphere of rhetoric during the 7th and 8th centuries A.H. could have been turned out as a source for the formation of the science communications.
Rhetoric had been sufficiently Capable to enter new spheres such as communiCations, but why, did it come to a stop on the way of its development of science of communications, centuries after sakaki, detached from Muslims' progress in rhetoric, was founded by Europeans'? In this article we shall try to study this question and give pertment answers for it.